January 30th, 2009
As with most legal questions, the answer is a resounding “it depends.” In one respect, there is a right to health care in this country. Various federal and state statutes mandate the provision of emergency health care even if the patient is unable to pay. Many more anti-discrimination laws focus on the health care industry to the extent that many doctors and hospitals practically take any patient that walks through the door. In this respect, there is a right to health care in the sense that anyone who needs it can procure it free from arbitrary objections.
On the other hand, there is not an absolute right to health care in the way it exists in other countries with socialized medicine schemes. With the exception of emergency treatment, medical care is a market commodity that cannot be gotten without paying the price. In this sense, there is no right to health care in the same way that there is no right to a steak dinner; you can get it if you pay for it, but you are not entitled to it in any ontological sense.


